Add Concept Exercise for type checking. #2704
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Still not done!
Create all the functions using typeof
Co-authored-by: Derk-Jan Karrenbeld <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Derk-Jan Karrenbeld <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Derk-Jan Karrenbeld <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Derk-Jan Karrenbeld <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Derk-Jan Karrenbeld <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
I've added you as an author, I feel that you have built a fair bit of the exercise. |
SleeplessByte
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2025
Member
SleeplessByte
left a comment
SleeplessByte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll batch submit these. Then publish, have some people solve it, and then I'll add some more tests. Thanks for this. It's another great one @quintuple-mallard !
Member
|
I'll fix |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the
assembly-lineexercise andtype-checkingconcept to the JavaScript track.A few notes/questions:
numbersconcept, but all slightly different. Does this matter?nodejsthat I haven't been able to fix has stopped me from running theformatscript. Configlet and the other node scripts have been working.Object.hasOwnrather thanObject.prototype.hasOwnProperty, as it seemsObject.hasOwnis the recommended overObject.prototype.hasOwnProperty, that is considered somewhat outdated.